Thursday, 5 March 2015

Ban on cow slaughter: a violation of freedom of choice of food and profession



The grant of assent to the Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, not only takes away the fundamental liberty of people to choose their own food, but also marks first victory for the hidden agenda of the “RSS Parivar”. It appears that, the ‘Parivar’ is now trying to regulate the freedom of faith of people and henceforth the hidden agenda of the Parivar is going to decide what people should eat and what not.

President Pranav Mookherjee has granted assent to the Animal Preservation (Amendment) Bill, 1995 after passage of 19 years. The legislation, which has taken away the fundamental liberty of people to choose their own food, was passed by Maharashtra legislature when Shivsena-BJP combine was in power. It failed to get presidential assent during the regime of Atal Bihari Vajpaiyee. Nor did President Shankar Dayal Sharma also touch the bill during the National Front government led by Janata Dal. It seems the president had to grant assent immediately after Narendra Modi came to power.

Nowhere across Maharashtra or anywhere in India cow are slaughtered. Indian society has adhered to this tradition for ages. During the Vedic period, Purohits used to eat slaughtered cow meat, but thereafter most of Hindus started worshiping cow. Jammu and Kashmir was the first state in India to ban cow slaughter. Thereafter, in several states legislations were enacted prohibiting cow slaughter. Mughal ruler Babar was the first ruler to impose ban on cow slaughter. Sawarkar, the godfather of political Hinduism, used to say that cow is not mother, but a useful animal. In his book, titled, Ksha Kirane (X-rays), Savarkar sought to know why not eat cow beef, instead of protecting cows. Some religious texts tell us that God resides in the cow. In its Varah form, the God has become pig. Then why not establish Pig Worshipping Centers and start worshipping pigs? Babar himself has said that if this country is to be ruled, one must respect the feelings of majority Hindus.

Cow is connected with religious feelings, and according to the Constitution, one must respect religious sentiments, and therefore there has to be ban on cow slaughter. The ban on cow slaughter is there since long, and nobody slaughters cows. But, why then a separate bill was brought for banning slaughter of cow-race i.e. bulls, bullocks, male buffalo etc. All these animals are not regarded divine under the Hindu mythology. Generally, farmers dispose of animals like bulls, bullocks and male buffaloes having completed 15 years of age and thus becoming useless for agricultural purposes. It becomes economically unviable for farmers to just keep feeding animals not useful for agricultural purposes, and most of the times such animals find their way to slaughter houses.

It is always better to let animals lose to eat plastic and garbage across the city. It gives rise to two major industries. The meat of bigger animals is comparatively cheap and thus it makes a major source of proteins for the poor, especially the backward classes amongst Hindus, as they do not treat beef forbidden. At the same time, the slaughter of these animals has provided a source of livelihood to a number of Muslims.

This new legislation has not only taken away the proteins from the diet of the poor, but will also render thousands in leather-goods business jobless.

Along with slaughter houses, a huge industry of leather goods has risen. Slaughter houses generate cheap and good quality leather for this industry. It supports self-employed persons making shoes and chappals as also various leather items like bags, purses etc. This entire industry will now be destroyed. The domestic leather industry, especially the major ones at Dharavi, Delhi, Chennai and Kanpur has provided employment to lakhs of persons, majority Hindus. Unfortunately, the end of this domestic leather industry is beginning in Maharashtra.

But, why do you think all this is being done? Because, unless you destroy the domestic leather industry, the foreign players will not be able to dominate the Indian leather market, and that is the reason why all this is being done. But, before that the first casualty of this entire episode will be the farming community. Famers get some money in their hand if they dispose of old animals that are not useful anymore by selling those to slaughter houses. It is really, useful to sell such animals to slaughter houses than just allow them to roam free. The skin, meat, bones every part of their body is put to use. There is thus substance in the statement of farmer’s leaders that this enactment is going to push the farmer in more trouble.

The word cow-race is really confusing. The ban on cow slaughter is already in place. Nobody is objecting to it. This attempt to force farmers to continue to fee old, useless animals is being done in the name of ‘cow-race’, entirely for enabling foreign multinational players to dominate the Indian leather market.

This act has at a time caused injustice to farmers, leather goods manufacturers, slaughter houses, employees of slaughter houses and the supplementary employment generated out of these professions. This act not just takes away the liberty to choose your own food, but also violates the Constitutional fundamental rights.

President Pranav Mookherjee could have sent the bill back for reconsideration. But, he has not done so. It was really not expected of the person of the stature of Pranav Mookherjee that he will surrender so early to Modi government.


Kapil Harischandra Patil, MLC
President, Lok Bharti

(In 1996, Kapil Patil had strongly protested against the Bill, created a movement against it and had also led a group to the then President of India)



No comments:

Post a Comment